Quote:The sarcasm was you suggesting id prefer 1930 Germany, I'm giving you benefit of the doubt that's sarcasm at least.

There's a difference between open to public and funded by the public. I have no problem defending the rights of people I disagree with in this case discrimination. Private companies not receiving public funding should be free to conduct business however they see fit, so long as they do not harm someone or someone else's property.

Dude. If you own a restaurant, you are subject to certain laws and regulations. There will be health inspections for example. Who pays for these health inspections of your private restaurant? The taxpayer. The general public. I'd also be willing to bet your restaurant is alongside a road, again serviced with the general public's tax dollars. So there are no private companies "not receiving public funding." If I have to pay to make sure you are keeping your business clean, and to make sure people have access to it, you better believe I can come eat, too.

---