Quote:Hey, 100% of alchemists believe they can make gold from lead. Why should "climate scientists" be any different?


And again, the "hottest year on record" was well within the margin of error. So they don't KNOW but claim it anyway, because (religion disguised as) SCIENCE!


That's the issue, the claim knowledge that's constantly proven false and yet we should all still believe them because of their title. Have you seen the graph that shows the divergence between their faulty computer models and reality? They are so far off we should arrest and try them for malpractice crimes against humanity.

You have an extremely poor handle on the situation. You've been brainwashed--that is not an exaggeration. You can't fault yourself tho as far greater powers than your reasoning ability have conspired to trick you into acting against your own best interest.


To me, it's fascinating on a sociological level that people actually would rather believe a politician (career liar, bought and sold, no data) than a scientist (math, peer-reviewed, published works, science speaks for itself).


Again, the science is simple. If you concede that the greenhouse effect exists (which the existence of actual greenhouses prescribes) and that co2 is a greenhouse gas, that co2 is captured in the atmosphere, then you cannot help but arrive to a singular conclusion. It's a valid argument. The premises are true and the conclusion follows from the premises. You might as well argue that the sky is green if you are going to argue against climate change, it would make as much sense.

---