Quote:You have an extremely poor handle on the situation. You've been brainwashed--that is not an exaggeration. You can't fault yourself tho as far greater powers than your reasoning ability have conspired to trick you into acting against your own best interest.


To me, it's fascinating on a sociological level that people actually would rather believe a politician (career liar, bought and sold, no data) than a scientist (math, peer-reviewed, published works, science speaks for itself).


Again, the science is simple. If you concede that the greenhouse effect exists (which the existence of actual greenhouses prescribes) and that co2 is a greenhouse gas, that co2 is captured in the atmosphere, then you cannot help but arrive to a singular conclusion. It's a valid argument. The premises are true and the conclusion follows from the premises. You might as well argue that the sky is green if you are going to argue against climate change, it would make as much sense.