Quote:Sorry, but I'm not going to bow down to the whims of political correctness and not call them "thugs" just for the sake of trying not to hurt other people's feelings. If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, than it's a duck.

 

 

I don't understand why a controversy exists around this thread. The Seahawks acted like sore losers and couldn't accept defeat graciously. One of their players got the bright idea to instigate a fight and pandemonium ensued. The players acted completely immature and unprofessional following the game sealing INT while millions of people all around the Country watched. They disgraced their fans, they disgraced their team, and they disgraced the game as a whole. They're thugs. End of story.

 

I could say alot of things here. (I hope FBT is watching so I can get banned again) You are completely stupid and honestly stereotypical if not a bit racist. You are categorizing men who are more educated, talented, and more wealthy than you are sir. To judge these men when they havent done a thuggish thing is ignorant. Is Emmit Smith a "thug"? Is Demarrious Thomas a "thug"? Is Deion Sanders a "thug"? But Sherman, Lynch, Thomas, Chancellor, etc are "thugs"? They haven't committed a crime or broken any significant rules. How are they "thugs"?

 

Lets not even forget that the blow that had drawn the flag was from the Seattle LB, was actually in reaction to a "thuggish" move by your beloved Gronk. No one is blaming him or bashing him or calling him a  big country bama bully. Its fans/people like you that make it hard for the game to be pure and for others to have fun. You sir are stupid. Plain stupid.

 

(I dont care if I get banned......again)

---