Talk about misconstruding an argument, he was making the argument that we over regulate simple matters. He said if companies don't require their employee's to wash their hands the free market would simply run them out of buisness. Imagine a sign in Starbucks, "We don't require employee's to wash hands" would you still eat there? I wouldn't! And don't tell me there wouldn't be a sign without regulation, the threat of a civil suit is why companies would display a sign. The reality is it's a no brainier of course restaurants are going to require employee's to wash their hands, regulating they put up a sign is a waste of resources.

---