Quote:More of the same, coming out every darn day:

 

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials...talism.htm

 

Slip off the Enviro-whacko masks and out come the globalist anti-capitalists.

 

But we should totally go right along with it because #science!

 

So you think these scientists are trying to destroy capitalism.  

 

Why can't we just all admit that man-made global warming exists, and then start talking about whether any proposed solution is desirable or affordable.   The so-called denialists are merging together two different things: 1) is it true, and 2) do we want to do anything about it.    The reason for their denial is #2.   They say it's not true, because they don't want to do anything about it.   Now, to me, #2 above is a legitimate point of discussion.   But #1 above is not.   #1 is settled as far as I can tell.   So to me, the discussion should be about #2.   To me, man-made global warming is about 95% settled.   Whether we can afford any solution to it is a legitimate point of discussion.   BUT WE CAN'T EVEN GET TO THAT DISCUSSION UNTIL WE AGREE ON WHETHER MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING EXISTS.   And that's what is most frustrating about this whole argument.  

---