Quote:So you think these scientists are trying to destroy capitalism.  

 

Why can't we just all admit that man-made global warming exists, and then start talking about whether any proposed solution is desirable or affordable.   The so-called denialists are merging together two different things: 1) is it true, and 2) do we want to do anything about it.    The reason for their denial is #2.   They say it's not true, because they don't want to do anything about it.   Now, to me, #2 above is a legitimate point of discussion.   But #1 above is not.   #1 is settled as far as I can tell.   So to me, the discussion should be about #2.   To me, man-made global warming is about 95% settled.   Whether we can afford any solution to it is a legitimate point of discussion.   BUT WE CAN'T EVEN GET TO THAT DISCUSSION UNTIL WE AGREE ON WHETHER MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING EXISTS.   And that's what is most frustrating about this whole argument.  

 

No, Anthropogenic Global Climate Change does not exist. The science is fraudulent as we continue to see when more and more of the data are revealed to be incorrect or intentionally "massaged" to get the answers the zealots want. No crisis means no funding. No crisis means no assault on Capitalism. No crisis means all the Leftists in the Academia have no Echo Chamber to scream their falsehoods into. It's the biggest case of Groupthink we've ever experienced.

---