I hate this "we have to spend" argument whenever the Jaguars make a questionable signing.  I don't think anyone on here is saying not to spend the money.  We are just saying to spend it wisely.  

 

Just take Jermey Parnell as an example.  No one is saying that Khan should take the $6.4 million per year Parnell will be paid and buy another yacht.  The question is whether it was smarter to sign Parnell (an almost 29 year old career backup with 7 career starts) for $6.4 million per year or Bulaga (who many consider a top five right tackle) for $7 million.  CBSsports had Bulaga as the 8th best free agent while Parnell was ranked 75th.  Was signing Parnell instead of Bulaga smart?  That's the question.  BTW, even if you don't Bulaga for some reason, ask the question whether there is anyone else who would have represented a better use of the money?

---