Quote:I can't continue to repeat myself. I'm saying one simple FACT. It's not a presumption, it's a ruling. The prosecution has the burden of proof. If they can't prove guilty without a reasonable doubt, the dependent is found I.e. Ruled, not guilty. There is no burden of proof for defense to prove a client innocent. It's the way our court of law works. Re read my posts before you call someone else a bad reader.

 

So "Innocent until proven guilty" no longer exist?

 

So someone being found "Not Guilty" can be brought into another case because we say they really weren't "innocent" in that first one?

 

Not Guilty = Innocent Maintained  or are you refuting that?

 

Cause you said in the Court of Law there is a "difference" between Innocent and Not Guilty.

---