Quote:I'm not going off just stats. Its his better stats plus more explosion (in literally every single benchmark). We're talking about the more productive player and the better athlete.

 

Obviously I think this is more clear cut than most, and no knock to Fowler at all, but I'm just trying to address some of these fallacies about Fowler somehow having a better year or better combine. I really haven't heard one convincing argument aside from his wider array of moves. And that's debatable.

 

Yes you are just going off of stats. If you were basing your opinion on anything else, you would not even mention stats at all, just what you see during games .If you want to argue about who is better, show us videos so we can see what they actually do and how they play. Numbers are totally meaningless without the game clips to back them up.

 

I am not saying Dante Fowler is better than Vic Beasley. Fowler is a versitle DE/OLB who would be an Otto in our defense. So you have to compare him to other pass rushers who played both OLB and DE every week and Beasley to other pass rushers who only do what he does. Fowler and Beasley is an apples to oranges comparison.

---