The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
Supreme Court turns away challenge to Wisconsin voter ID law
|
Quote:Objectively according to whom? If he believes or feels a certain way and you don't, that doesn't make your beliefs or feelings any more objective than his, it just makes them different. I haven't even gotten my hands dirty in this debate (or any lately), but nice try. If you really think that Eric looks at things objectively, then I don't know what to tell you. He has even admitted to viewing things from a very radical and subjective viewpoint to stay consistent with libertarianism. If he can admit that, then you probably shouldn't take offense to me calling out his lack of objectivity. |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.