Quote:This is either a really good problem

 

or a really bad one...

 

being that there is so much differential between people's opinions of the best and or most complete.

 

I think our 3 starting WRs right now are all 2nd year players... and any one of them could flame out.

Hell, they all could.

 

I'd actually be pretty OK with us having 3 really good receivers in which none of them stand out as what people claim to be the #1 guy.

It works for a lot of the really good teams.

 

Yeah having a Calvin Johnson type guy would be great.

But the combo of Arob, Lee, and Hurns (possibly another addition) could be really good for years. And if no one emerges as a top flight guy, you aren't stressed to resign any of them down the road.

 

That ALL being said...

 

I expect ARob to lead the team in yards and possibly TDs (Thomas is the other guy I think could lead in TDs)

Hurns I think may have limited snaps so I don't expect him to top any stat lines, barring injuries to the other guys. But I think he can be a very good rotation receiver. 

While Lee will have some gaudy YAC stats (screens, etc.) but otherwise average numbers.

 

I would be okay with Lee having "average" numbers if he provides a true deep threat that can stretch the field and command S attention.

 

But I think the potential is there for all three to be highly productive players for us.  I'd love to see this group replicate the 1991 Skins WR trio (Monk, Clark, Sanders) or the Bills of the early 1990s (Reed, Lofton, Beebe).

---