Quote:The concept isn't the problem, its the compromise in free association that is the problem. I don't care what the category is, people shouldn't be discriminated against, however to make that the same as outlawing all discrimination you have to revoke the rights of others to freely associate with whom they choose.

 

Sacrificing one set of rights for another is the exact type of compromises that lead to no one having any rights left to sacrifice.

 

To look at it from another aspect, where is the moral justification in using the force of government to force one individual to interact with another. I'll go back to is it justifiable to force a Black business owner to serve a member of the Klan?  The category shouldn't change the legal standing of an issue.

You are making the choice to operate a business open to the public. You are than choosing to discriminate people. I do not think  that has any place in society. It breeds hate and ignorance and should not be allowed. The problem is not what YOU are proposing as the issue with it. It's other wants to be able to legally do it. It's based on hate and I am sure you see that. It's no different than other forms of hate that have been outlawed. 

---