The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
|
If you're a State employee, then you shouldn't descriminate on any condition.
If you're a private employee, I believe you should be free to do so at your own expense. Having said that, if I was that baker, I would have sold them that cake. Jesus hung out with the sinners. I may not agree with it, but I'm going to do my best to be a good example. Their lifestyle doesn't offend me. I don't, however, believe that people that believe otherwise should be forced into submission. The idea that intolerance should be legally oppressed is a bit narrow-minded. It looks good on paper, but who sets the guidelines? Where is the limit? What happens when reasonableness now is not reasonableness later? |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.