Quote:Nobody wants "action to break out", but that's the reality.  In a situation like that, you can't be passive or "diplomatic".  You must be aggressive and show that you have the "upper hand".  The slightest sign of being passive is viewed as a weakness.

 

Regarding the US provoking anything is ridiculous.  We haven't done anything like that since we "crossed the line of death".  If you don't know what that means, google the phrase.

I understand the strategy behind it. I just question it's worth with nations that are not powers is all. It seems like it's asking for a conflict when all relationships are tentative or openly hostile in the region. 

 

You don't think any actions we have taken since 86 (that's where you phrase linked me in google) have been provocative in nature at all? Like constant invasion, or toppling of regimes or aiding various groups to hurt other groups than doing it all again? I'm not saying it's right or wrong but that seems pretty darn provocative to me. 

---