Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Top 20% of Income Earners pay 84% of Income Tax

#15

Quote:The disparity between the "haves" and the "have-nots" has been growing, and it did grow under the Bush Administration, but the point is, it accelerated under the Obama Administration.

 

Consider this.  My income has been pretty steady between 2008 and now, despite changing jobs a couple of times (I am a Government Contractor, so my income depends on which contract I am working on).  I have received periodic cost-of-living raises during that period.  However, my income tax burden has increased in that period.  During that period and thanks to Obamacare, I had to purchase a "compliant policy" rather than what I had in order to avoid being penalized.  That has led to a reduction in my effective take home pay.  Health insurance policies aren't cheap, and because of my income I don't qualify for any subsidies.

 

The strategy of the right includes cutting taxes for people like me, what you call "rich".  If you look at the chart that I linked to in the first post, I am not far from being in the upper 20% of income earners.  As I said before though, I am far from what I would consider "rich" when it comes to income or money.
 

Even if you qualified for the subsidies I'd advise you not to take them. Plenty of people don't know but those subsidies are tax credit advances, if for any reason when the taxes that following year roll around they decided you where given to much of an advance or God forbid you don't really get the tax credit for whatever reason you now OWE that money to the IRS.

 

For example I qualified for a $500 something dollar tax credit towards an insurance premium if we signed up under the ACA. I read all the fine print and it said clear as day, that $500 something dollar subside was a loan from the IRS to be paid back by the tax credit to be determined when I filled the following year. So in other words if I use that $500 a month credit at the end of the year I've "borrowed" $6,000 from the IRS to pay insurance premiums that year. When I file taxes so long as there's a $6000 credit for me I'm good, if for ANY reason there's no $6000 credit I owe them that money.

 

What's to stop them from saying you know those subsidies are going to cost to much this year, we're going to half the tax credit this year. I don't have nearly enough faith in the system to accept any kind of advance on a future tax credit.

 

I'll pay the penalty and wait it out a little longer to see how this all shakes out. A $6000 tax bill would ruin me.

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Top 20% of Income Earners pay 84% of Income Tax - by EricC85 - 04-14-2015, 05:48 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!