Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
BOOM! Fed Up Citizens Fight Back Against Freeway Blocking Protests!

#69

Quote:They help to fund the national parks service as well. I get the feeling however, you would be in favor private industry owning our parks and therefore being able to raze them and put in more starbucks and condos. 

 

Regardless of weather you agree or disagree with the law, he willfully broke the law and as you pointed out in the traffic violation thread,  he should pay the price. Would you take the same stance with the traffic violators were they to call in friends with guns to avoid paying their fines? I highly doubt it. 

Actually I don't support privatized parks, national parks serve a purpose. They are a hands-off area the public has designated to industry, these area's require upkeep which is why there's a charge for access. This goes back to the point there is a purpose for the government to hold this land, the public has decided we want this land preserved undeveloped for the enjoyment of society. 

 

Now the land that the BLM is claiming and charging ranchers for requires no upkeep and is claimed by the federal government solely for the purpose of taxing ranchers. This isn't managed land, it's grasslands across the west that cattle have grazed on for centuries. Again look at the budget of the BLM over half of it's budget is in administrative cost of collecting, tracking and distributing these grazing permits. It's an agency created to tax simply to support the existence of the agency.

 

As for the fines, would I support armed resistance to the fines. Well for it to be an applicable scenario the federal government would have of seized private property. For example if the federal government claimed in Oregon you now have to pay an access fee to use the highways, which is crap because people have been using highways for decades without fee's. But nope the newly created Federal Division of Highway Management is overseeing the highway system in Oregon and you sir must pay an additional tax for access. Well you refused to pay that tax? we are going to now confiscate your vehicles. Damn straight I'd support armed resistance.

[Image: 5_RdfH.gif]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
BOOM! Fed Up Citizens Fight Back Against Freeway Blocking Protests! - by EricC85 - 04-24-2015, 12:11 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!