Quote: 

<p style="font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">I was reading Gil Brandt's list of best available players going into the second round and reading this description screamed Otto to me:

<p style="font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">

6) Eli Harold, OLB, Virginia

Vitals: 6-3 1/8, 247 pounds, 4.58 40.

<p style="font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">In my opinion, he's the best slash player -- able to play with his hand on the ground, rush the passer or drop into space -- available, and that's the type of defensive player everybody is chasing. He was very productive at Virginia, piling up 54 tackles, 14.5 tackles for loss, seven sacks and a pick in 2014.

<p style="font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"> 

<p style="font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"> 

<p style="font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">That said, what do you guys think?

 

 

all depends where the value is. if harold is a guy they look at and they think, 1. surprised hes sitting here for us at 36 or 2. hes a significant upgrade to skuta, then yes i could see that happen. 

 

same deal for coleman, 1. coleman is here? 2. hes a lot better than all of our other RBs?

 

in my mind though, the biggest upgrade that we could add would be at FS, but are the available players at 36 worth it? or is that a huge reach and it makes more sense to get the RB there. 

 

thats why these guys are paid the big bucks. 

---