My understanding of how it went down.

 

Two guys rob a store at gunpoint.

 

They leave the store.

 

Just outside the store an armed man confronts them with a gun.

 

(little unsure here of the facts)

 

The robbers then pull their own guns back out?

 

Man shoots them both to death.

 

Before the robbers pulled their own weapons "back out", the man confronting them was wrong (imo) to attempt to hold the suspects at gun point, as it doesn't appear that life, or limb was in apparent or imminent danger at that time.

 

Once the robbers "did" pull their weapons out, the citizen was justified to protect his own life.

 

My final analysis ... The citizen should be charged with a crime, but not with anything to do with the shooting death.

---