The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
We don't have a revenue problem, we have a SPENDING problem
|
Quote:So that would be an allocation issue, if we agree spending in some area's has to be cut we could reallocate those to the underfunded programs. But I just don't think we need a single dollar more in "revenue" we just have to figure out what should be cut, what is necessary and how the hell we dig out of 17 trillion dollars.While I do think the overall tax burdens could be shifted more away from impacting lower incomes and middle class to upper classes, I tend to think we don't need to increase intake of funds as you have. Cutting for sure needs to be done. That's the big debate right now. Where do the cuts get made and what is worthy of funding. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.