The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
Deflate Gate - the report is in
|
Quote:We know they told the head ref and I'm assuming he felt the pressure of not delaying the game to check the balls once they went missing. It seems like it was Walt Anderson's decision, though the NFL probably should have the head ref worrying about footballs going missing when he is preparing for a game. If someone above Walt Anderson told him not to test the balls, then that person should be out on the street by now. Walt Anderson clearly had more information on game day that increased the suspicion. At that point he should have checked the balls in spite of orders from above (assuming there were orders from above). To allow one team an advantage just to avoid starting the game 10 minutes late is inexcusable. Quote:Also, you do not think Tom lied when he said he didn't think there was anything to the story and comfortable saying no one was involved in this epic scandal? You are making arguments, but haven't really said what you think to be true. I have no idea whether or not Brady was lying. He hasn't admitted anything, and neither have the equipment guys. There are reasonable (albeit unlikely) non-cheating explanations for everything. Wells 'more probable than not' statement fits the evidence I've read. A probability of more than 80/20 would have resulted in a stronger statement. I personally think that punishment should require more certainty than that. Goodell has demonstrated several times in the past that he'll punish someone with a lot less proof, so I expect a lengthy suspension. But if he then lets the official cheater slide when that's 100% known, what does that say? In that case I'd say it's more probable than not that Goodell was the one who ordered the game to be started with the Colts at an unfair disadvantage. "Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?" |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.