Quote:Trust him he did the research. Can't provide a link but ask you to google it and spend a "couple" of hours re-researching it you will come to the same conclusion because the great state of California says so.

Anchorman is a fair poster I give him the benefit of doubt. The number doesn't really matter the point he is trying to make is the vast majority use the system within the confines of the law. Which would be rather hard to disprove in all honesty, you can only really measure the people caught using the system outside it's legal confines so there's a real unknown variable there.


Now we can argue that the confines are not strict enough or the validity of the system itself but to focus on the exact percentage of abuse is kind of missing the point.


Even if the system produced 100% legal compliance the problem still persists, a vast majority of the population is incapable of the most basic task to human nature feeding their household. The solution we've presented is a broad check with no incentive to either make financial changes, or find other avenues of self sufficiency.

---