Quote:I don't think anyone is advocating "cutting off" certain programs. I believe that many people would agree that there is a need for some reform.


Reform should not include "throwing more money at the problem", which is a standard among liberals. Their idea of "reform" is to spend more money and pay for it by taxing the rich.


Reform should include taking the steps necessary to reduce and ultimately eliminate the fraud that occurs within the system.


Reform should also include the steps necessary to influence people to make better decisions and better choices. What I'm talking about is perhaps using the money that we currently put into these programs to perhaps further limit what could be purchased. I'm not talking about just eliminating the ability to purchase alcohol or tobacco products, but also perhaps direct people to be able to buy say chicken rather than lobster or steak. The WIC system somewhat does this.


Reform should also include drug testing. In order to get a job in most places, a potential employee must pass drug screening. Why should it be different if they are going to be "employed" and paid using my tax dollars?