The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
The Supreme Court upholds Obamacare Subsidies
|
Quote:Since when did the consequences of a decision become the deciding factor of interpreting a law? Regardless good or bad their job is to interpret the law, they openly said the literal interpretation would've lead to an unsatisfactory decision so they just looked at the intent. That is such a garbage and dangerous precedent to set liberals should be furious. Legislative intent is considered when legislation is not clear or doesn't address a particular issue. It's been that way for a long time.
I was wrong about Trent Baalke.
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.