Quote:Nah lol,

What's foolish that you think the Seahawks are a better team with Russell Wilson than if they had Brees.

 

Where would Brees be on the Seahawks, and where would Wilson be on the Saints?

Idk if you have answered this yet or not. But I would like to hear what you have to say. 

Seahawks went to the SB with Wilson... I don't think Brees could improve that much....

Wilson extends plays with his feet, Brees doesn't really. Wilson has the option threat. Brees does not.

 

Now... Would Brees post better stats as a Seahawks QB? No.. probably not. In that system they would still lean on the Beast.

 

Wilson on the Saints, imo, at least gives them an edge to break .500

He makes plays where there aren't. Granted.. the Saints roster is not as good as the Hawks, especially on the D side...

 

But RIGHT NOW in their careers I take A LOT of the younger QBs over Brees, who has been the most accurate dink and dunker the past 10 years probably.

His deep game has never been overly impressive. What was impressive is that he led the Saints back from the Aints.

He did so with Bush and Sproles bailing him out on a lot of dump passes. And some very good plays from some pretty OK receivers, like Colston and Jimmy Graham.

 

But to sit there and act like this guy deserves to be considered the top 3 or top 5 QBs RIGHT NOW?

I can't get behind it... sorry.

 

Even if I am "always wrong" about the QB.

---