Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
BREAKING: Court rules against Redskins

#58

Quote:However, not all Native Americans used tomahawks, so that might be offensive to some them because the term "tomahawk" could mean a stereotype.

 

My point is that PC has gotten so out of control that it's starting to dictate and take over society.  The Washington Redskins have been around longer than probably 99% of the participants on this message board.  It's never "offended" anyone until recently, and I would wager that those that are "offended" probably don't have a drop of Native American blood in them.
As to point one, you're typically one of the most well-spoken, thoughtful debaters on here, even if we disagree more often than we agree. That said, "tomahawk" being a stereotype because not all Native American tribes used them is kind of ridiculous. It's the type of thing I'd expect from another poster who frequents the same topics you and I do, but not from you.

 

As to point two, I'm not personally offended by the word "Redskin". I'm not personally offended by any other symbols that have been prevalent on here lately either, but if a word or symbol is hurtful or derogatory to a large group of people, then it's right to consider changing it.

 

The "Redskins" situation will end predictably: one or more NFL broadcast partners will issue a decree saying that the word is not to be used on their network, and the others will follow suit. The team will start fishing for public money to replace FedEx Field, and no one will be willing to give it to them as long as the team is called the "Redskins". I believe DC has already hinted that they won't allow the team to build a new stadium within city limits as long as the name remains. Congress will probably get involved, because it's something they so dearly love to do with minor things so that bigger things go unnoticed, and there will be extreme public pressure on both the club and the NFL to change the name. Finally, we'll hit critical mass, and the team will give in and partner with advocacy groups to choose a new name.

 

Do I think there are far more important things we should be talking about? Hell yes, but I'm not going to completely discount a group of people who claim that the word "Redskin" is no better than dropping an n-bomb.

Reply


Messages In This Thread
BREAKING: Court rules against Redskins - by Guest - 07-08-2015, 04:42 PM
BREAKING: Court rules against Redskins - by D6 - 07-08-2015, 06:18 PM
BREAKING: Court rules against Redskins - by FBT - 07-10-2015, 03:04 PM
BREAKING: Court rules against Redskins - by TJBender - 07-10-2015, 04:02 PM



Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!