Quote:It's not a new tactic.  It's just exercised with far more effectiveness by the left. 

You should strongly consider changing your avatar to a picture of Antonin Scalia. Just saying. It's always about left vs. right, good vs. evil with you. If you'd start looking at the merits of the situation, you might see that the world isn't such a "one way or the other" place. Pulling the Dukes of Hazzard was stupid, taking Jeb Bush out of context is bullhonkey, and the ACA is a good idea stuck in a flawed package that will, over time, figure out what it needs to look like and get there. It's not always as simple as "four legs good, two legs better".

 

And if you really are considering the merits of each situation and arriving at the same conclusions every time, then hey, more power to you, but you lose all credibility in an argument when you can't post without name-calling and/or blaming everything on the libs, the proggies, the PC police and the gay mafia, who are, of course, the only groups that would ever disagree with you. Admin tag or not, I really don't care, I'm calling you out because there are people on this board from both sides of aisle, some from far across the aisle of each other, who make debating in this forum fun and engaging, and then there's you throwing names around and belittling anyone (forum member or not, person or group) who disagrees with you about anything. 

 

So is this bill about the libs, the proggies, the PC police and the gay mafia sitting around a poker table in a smoky back room of an Italian joint plotting the downfall of America? No. It's a liberal politician who's hoping that Hillary Clinton wins the White House, and is angling for a position on her Cabinet if that happens. Unless the 23 other names on that bill are a true bipartisan split (hint: they're not), the thing won't even pass. It's not an attempt by the evil liberals (who, if you're to be believed, always work in perfect unity with each other) to subvert society. It's a politician using a hot-button issue to get her name out there, an action that, in politics, knows no gender, no party and no position.

---