Quote:Conservatives will of course dismiss it for being a 'liberal source' (meanwhile continuing to say that Liberals shouldn't call into question the reliability of the sources they post...) but for others that are interested:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/1...V920150716

Quote: 

If Iran refuses access but five of the eight international signatories to the deal demand an investigation under a newly created joint commission, Iran must comply, she said.


<p style="font-size:1.6em;font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">"It's not a request. It's a requirement," Rice said. Iran would be "bound to grant that access."

<p style="font-size:1.6em;font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">Under the deal announced earlier this week, sanctions imposed by the United States, European Union and United Nations will be lifted in exchange for Iran agreeing to long-term curbs on its nuclear program, which the West and Israel have suspected was aimed at creating a nuclear bomb.

<p style="font-size:1.6em;font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">As part of the deal, Iran will have a 24-day period in which it can address concerns over suspicious sites and agree to inspections.

<p style="font-size:1.6em;font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;">But the procedure does not explicitly force Iran to admit that its military sites could be open to foreign inspections, leaving some uncertainty over the access Iran will allow in practice.

EDIT: or if 24+ days aren't enough, Iran can just claim it's a military site