Quote:Right, because taking money from a Russian entity that was government owned and which subsequently secured a deal that the State Department endorsed under a certain Secretary of State who prefers pant suits giving the Russian government, no ally of the United States under the current administration, control over almost a quarter of the Uranium production in the United States.  You're right.  Enemy of state clearly means people I disagree with.  You really got me there.

 

Shall I go on about the Saudi money that came from the same sources that helped to fund 9/11, or is that just more people I disagree with?  Or all the Chinese money?

 

There's a pretty long list of donors who I couldn't care less about politically, or what they think because they're intent on bringing down this country.  You see that as a disagreement on opinion.  Spin it any way you want. 

 

There are plenty of donors who are unseemly because they were doing business with the State Department when they were pumping hundreds of thousands or even millions into a family foundation that has overhead that runs about 75-90% (tough to pinpoint that figure because they're still cooking the books).  The Clinton's got rich off a charitable foundation that barely makes a dent in the charities they supposedly support despite raising hundreds of millions of dollars from people we disagree with, including some enemies of state (apparently not on your list, but then again, if you're an Obama supporter, is there really an enemy other than conservatives?).