Quote:Where did I say that students must 'embrace evolution'?  In fact I said straight out that science classes (which is where evolution belongs, because it's science)  -- i'll quote it for you even.

 

Why is Creationism required to stimulate thought and ideas?  


Evolution is taught in a science class.  (Namely, Biology and Integrated Science)

If Creationism as you argue should be taught along side evolution

You are saying Creationism should be taught in science classes.  

 

I never said that students must "embrace evolution".  If I did, I would like for you to highlight that.

 

What I did say is that creationism can be brought up and discussed in a science class to stimulate thought.

 

So creationism taught in a science class means that it's considered a science?  What about it being another idea or concept to consider?  Does that not stimulate thought?  Does that thought automatically claim that creationism is a science?  No it doesn't.  It simply offers a different point of view (something that liberals don't like).

 

You want to eliminate creationism from public education because you believe that it's the same thing as religion (censorship of free speech).

 

You want to teach that evolution is "the only concept" of how our planet was created. (indoctrination).

---