Quote:I understand it's a theory based on evidence but the interpretation of that evidence is coming from an ideology of no creator(s). Creationism only interprets the same evidence with the assumption everything comes from something. There is no way to prove either right or wrong, that's my point.

1. it does not come from an ideology of no creator(s). It comes from a standpoint that it's irrelevant or not necessary to the equation. It's a very unbiased way to research the matter. One starts with A must be true so let's go from there. The other starts with the question "what is true" or "is this true".

 

2. It's not an interpretation. The fruit flies and the tumor examples are experiments to test the predictions laid out in the theory of evolution. The theory makes a prediction (that evolution occurs naturally) that is then tested. The outcome of the tests continues to prop up the theory. 

 

3. Experiments have proven that evolution occurs. Over time new species will evolve from current ones and those branches will continue to move from each other until they no longer resemble the original. 

 

4. No predictions for experimentation exist for creation doctrine. It simple cannot be taught as science because there is literally nothing to back it up. None at all. If was to be taught you'd be teaching theology and not science. 

---