Quote:So wait a minute....  let me get this straight.  Eric85 rightly pointed out to you that there is little to no evidence to support your extrapolation (the idea that species morph or evolve into other isolated species over time "macro evolution") and your response is to blindly insult people who disagree with you, name call, and top it all off you blatantly  fundamentally and falsely categorize creation theory?  And you're the person who wants to be in charge of the way information is disseminated in schools?

 

Before we go any further, there have been people of faith in all of the scientific disciplines before James Darwin was thought about and long after he died.  To fundamentally label everyone who sees providence in a blade of grass as some wacked out flat earther is both insulting and WRONG.  For whatever reason in this strand of conversation its the people most ardently espousing adherence to proven scientific evidence and reason that are the first to resort to name calling and snarky remarks.  Why I don't know but frankly, I expect better!  

 

You still have yet to acknowledge the simple fact that in reality, evolution is not the opposite of creation.  I have yet to make any case supporting the field of abiogenesis which is essential to any belief in a universe devoid of a creator.  If you have an opinion or evidence that you would like to bring to the conversation i welcome it with open arms, but i would politely ask that you keep the insults and the backhanded compliments to yourself.

Show me where I said anything remotely close to that?

 

Little to no evidence is wrong. There is plenty of evidence that point to it as a reasonable extrapolation for evolution that occurs over time periods that are not observable to humans, as least not at this point in history. Compare that with creationism and what do you have? Zero, zilch nada. No evidence period.

 

If that extrapolation makes people uncomfortable or something that is understandable but not the fault or an indictment of the science. 

 

I, at no point, have said it's the opposite. Where are you getting your nonsense from? What I did say is it is not necessary. 

---