Quote:So let me get the straight.  You call me and everyone that agrees with me either moronic or less moronic.  Then when i call you out on it, highlighting exactly where you said that and you deny it.  

 

And you want to be taken seriously as an arbiter of what constitutes evidence or not?  

 

No wonder your support for the statement that "there is evidence to support the extrapolation" is to simply restate "there is evidence to support the extrapolation."

Since you forgot what you said

"To fundamentally label everyone who sees providence in a blade of grass as some wacked out flat earther is both insulting and WRONG."

 

Are you projecting or just experiencing a persecution complex?

 

I called no one a whacko flat earther.  I think it was very clear that the point I was trying to make is that over time people have started to accept evidence that parts of their belief was wrong and those that have not, IMO are morons. It's up to you whether you fall into the former or the latter. What else would you call people incapable of accepting evidence? I'm open for another term that hurts your feelings less.

 

The evidence is there for the taking all over the place from a multitude of sources. If you can't create a reasonable extrapolation off of proven scientific data than that's on you. 

---