Quote:I gave a very detailed reason based on biology that i don't feel the above citation proves the possibility of abiogensis.  If you disagree with my critique of the hypothesis then that's fine, you are free to respond in kind but you can't just cast me aside because of my greater beliefs.  Also i find it ironic that you are bringing up my greater belief system when i haven't and at the same time asserting that my ilk is the first to deviate from strict discussion of fact.  

 

And in totality as i have stated above and will continue to, the idea that there is a greater intelligent designer/creator is a conclusion based on the same evidence that we're all looking at.  From the start i have never said that i want to exclude anyone from the arena of ideas concerning the education of young people.  What i have said, and what i will NEVER BACK DOWN ON is that if you present something as proven or settled then you better able to show that it is proven and settled and if there are ideas or theories that have not been conclusively proven state that as well as the scientific arguments for and against.  Is that so much to ask?

Oh you have discounted it? Well then, stop the presses, inform the media, and get Hawking and is buddies on the line to let them know you've fully debunked the science. Who do you think has more credibility? The scientists of the world or you?

 

Just to be clear here. You have come to a conclusion with absolutely zero evidence on the matter? Clearly you approaching this very scientifically. So you are going present some evidence at some point? Anything at all?It seems your argument rests solely on science only having some answer and some predictions and not all the answers or all the predictions. That's pretty weak when your opposing view has nothing to stand on. 

---