The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Education Debate - Rubio Vs. Sanders
|
Quote:The time scale is irrelevant. This is another example of falsely invoking the law of large numbers. It's not a matter of 1 year or 1 billion years, you're not going to find a hydrogen atom with 6 neutrons anymore than you are going to find a set of amino acids on there own developing into a living system capable of cellular mitosis. The actual science is so sure that this doesn't happen that they have codified it in the law of Biogenesis (that all living systems come from previous living systems.) Your arguement about a hydrogen atom with 6 neutrons undermines any authority you have about the knowledge of the subject. 1. An atom with 6 nuetrons is CARBON, not hydrogen!!!! Sheesh!! Hydrogen becomes helium during the fission process that occurs in stars. Things happen over a large scale of time. It's the way the universe works. Come on man... You know that. The ron popeel theory... I like it... Because at the end of the day, if you took the time to pay attention during your college sciences, you'd know that these laws are what govern the universe. And life has occurred naturally though those processes.... You may not like it. But the universe doesn't care. If you want to look for a creationist slant on it, I'd suggest concerning yourself with who created those laws. There's why you can find some spriituality. At least that's my thoughts on it. I'm not sure how one can discount how via a large amount of time things can occur. Theoretical physists have verified as such. You may ignore time, but scientists don't. As for me writing equations... i am not so in love with myselfthat I will come on this message board are write large posts that bloviat about things I am not a PhD in. |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.