Carbon has 6 neutrons.  It's not that hard to figure out.  It's called the periodic table.  Generally speaking, when you have 6 neutrons, you have a Carbon atom.  (yes there are isotopes that have more or less than 6 neutrons, but that clearly wasn't what you were implying.)  

 

You're silly arguement was that you cant find 6 neutrons in a hydrogen atom.  This is obviously true, first, I doubt the hydogen atom could remain stable with 6 neutrons within it's nucleus...  But more importantly, in nature, if you have 6 neutrons, you'll more than likely have 6 protons, and thus you have Carbon.  No offense, but like your 1970's car versus 1970's truck thing you mentioned a few hundred pages ago, you are the one that seems to be confused.  Either that, or you're not quite sure what you are trying to explain...

 

You are correct, Fusion is what I meant.  I was typing too quickly.  But the point remains, Elements are created over huge periods of time via fusion.  

 

Aas far as point 3:  What hasn't?  The fact that over time, things have gotten more and more complex?  I'm not sure what proof you want me to provide, I'm not a PhD.  But I think you could start by looking looking into the work of Stanley Miller...  

 

And yes, theoretical probability is alot of math.  Math that is too complex for me to understand.  And again, I'm not such a blow-hard to write a wall of paragraphs trying to pretend I know more than I do...  

 

But the nuts and bolts of it are pretty simple.  Given X number of outcomes and X amount of time for outcomes to occur, there is X likely-hood that a specific outcome will occur based on the time period allotted.  The Universe is billions of years old.  Seems like the outcome of life, given all the elements and other environmental circumstances does provide a good likelihood for the creation based on the elements available during the earlier periods of the Earth's history and the amount of time allotted.  It's really not that much of a stretch, in my opinion.

---