Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Ferguson..Again?

#10

Quote:From that article:  "The rules don't apply to everyone," she said. "If those were black men walking around with rifles, they probably wouldn't be living today."

 

 

She's probably right...  That's the sad thing...
 

That's not really a fair thing to say, your comment or hers.

 

Also from the article.

Quote: 

Belmar plans to ask county prosecutor Bob McCulloch about the legality of armed patrols by the far-right anti-government activist group, which largely comprises past and present members of the military, first responders and police officers. But Missouri law allows anyone with a concealed carry permit to openly display a firearm anywhere in the state.
 

There are a couple of things in that paragraph that needs to be addressed.  Missouri law allows anyone with a concealed carry permit to openly display a firearm...  To me that says that the rules apply regardless of skin color.

 

The more disturbing and telling part of the AP story is that the group is called a "far-right anti-government activist group".  So let's see what the Oath Keepers group is all about.  Here is a copy and paste from their website.

 

Quote: 

 


About Oath Keepers
<p style="color:rgb(59,59,59);font-family:'Noto Sans', sans-serif;">Oath Keepers is a non-partisan association of current and formerly serving military, police, and first responders  who pledge to fulfill the oath all military and police take to “defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” That oath, mandated by Article VI of the Constitution itself, is to the Constitution, not to the politicians, and Oath Keepers declare that they will not obey unconstitutional orders, such as orders to disarm the American people, to conduct warrantless searches, or to detain Americans as “enemy combatants” in violation of their ancient right to jury trial. See the Oath Keepers Declaration of Orders We Will Not Obey for details.

<p style="color:rgb(59,59,59);font-family:'Noto Sans', sans-serif;">Oath Keepers reaches out to both current serving and veterans to remind them of their oaths, to teach them more about the Constitution they swore to defend, and to inspire them to defend it. See below for details on how we do that.

<p style="color:rgb(59,59,59);font-family:'Noto Sans', sans-serif;">Our motto is “Not on our watch!

<p style="color:rgb(59,59,59);font-family:'Noto Sans', sans-serif;">First responders includes fire-fighters, search and rescue, EMTs, disaster relief, and similar emergency personnel.  While not all such personnel take an oath to the Constitution, many do, and all are a critical audience for our mission.
 

Can someone explain to me how this is a "far-right anti-government activist group"?



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Ferguson..Again? - by Ringo - 08-11-2015, 09:49 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by HURRICANE!!! - 08-11-2015, 10:29 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by pirkster - 08-11-2015, 11:16 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by Bon Jagley - 08-11-2015, 11:21 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by JaG4LyFe - 08-11-2015, 11:40 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by Ringo - 08-11-2015, 04:25 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by The_Anchorman - 08-12-2015, 04:04 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by boudreaumw - 08-12-2015, 12:29 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by Ringo - 08-12-2015, 12:43 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by jagibelieve - 08-12-2015, 03:22 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by The_Anchorman - 08-12-2015, 03:33 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by jagibelieve - 08-12-2015, 03:44 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by The_Anchorman - 08-12-2015, 03:50 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by jagibelieve - 08-12-2015, 04:27 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by Ringo - 08-12-2015, 04:56 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by flsprtsgod - 08-12-2015, 06:53 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by The_Anchorman - 08-13-2015, 08:56 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by jagibelieve - 08-13-2015, 03:23 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by The_Anchorman - 08-13-2015, 03:47 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by jagibelieve - 08-13-2015, 04:39 PM
Ferguson..Again? - by jj82284 - 08-14-2015, 09:17 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by jtmoney - 08-14-2015, 09:49 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by copycat - 08-14-2015, 10:08 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by jj82284 - 08-14-2015, 10:31 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by The_Anchorman - 08-14-2015, 11:26 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by jj82284 - 08-17-2015, 10:28 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by The_Anchorman - 08-17-2015, 10:40 AM
Ferguson..Again? - by jj82284 - 08-18-2015, 12:38 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!