Quote:Yes and you chose your words poorly. Misleading people as you accuse the article of doing.


The difference being testing is done on controled sites by either the military or the defense contractor. These sites would not be under their control and if they were would not need a drone strike.


They would need to physically clear out the tunnels with personal or risk killing migrants. Now that they are inside the tunnels which is cheaper firing and very expensive rocket or just collapsing it from the inside?


This seems like common sense.

 

Not sure what you mean by me choosing my words poorly.  How did I mislead anyone?

 

So can a site that is along the border be "controlled"?  Is it really up to us to be sure that those here illegally either smuggling drugs or crossing the border illegally are not hiding in caves or tunnels?  There is a site here in Florida that is a bombing range that is commonly used by our military to conduct practice.  There is a fence and signs all around it warning of the danger.  If someone is determined to wander into the area and get's themselves killed, well, they have been warned.  Could the same thing not be done along the border?

 

If some ILLEGAL immigrants get killed in such a scenario, then perhaps it would send a message.  We are not specifically targeting individuals, we are conducting military training.

---