Quote:This is the most in sync I've seen this offense since David Garrard. Everyone agrees we need to score TD's instead of field goals and receivers need to start catching the ball. No one is debating that. What people are seeing is a lot of progress. We typically went 3 and out. Now we are putting 10 play drive after 10 play drive and moving the ball down field. Those are good things. The scheme is working. And Bortles is making throws in tight windows. The opportunities are there. Now we have to take advantage of them. But again, this is not what you said TC. You started the thread about the game stats using 2nd and 3rd stringers to make your argument. Only amateur fans look at game stats to evaluate how their team is doing in the preseason. The same fans who are upset when we lose a preseason game.

Jt I respect your post right up to where you accuse me of of saying something I never said. You make a nice point about the non 3 and outs and the longevity of drives. Those are real improvements. However my beef is we've struggled scoring touchdowns in the past and so far that hasn't changed. In my original post I used the box score to show that the Giants crappy offense dominated every category over our supposed improved offense. I never said anything about 2nd and 3rd stringers. Over all we still cannot consistently find the endzone. That's a real problem. Anyone that debates that is closing there eyes and pretending it's not there.


Bottom line the first unit needs to score tds and they have not down they can do that.

---