Quote:But jagi, that entity is representative of the university. They must follow the rules of the university as prescribed by the university code of conduct.


If an individual student conducted himself poorly off campus, the school still has a right to discipline as they see fit -- with in rules and code of conduct as prescribed by the university and signed off on by the individual. That is the university's right as an entity. And it's the responsibility of each person out entity that wishes to be a part of that institution.


Also, you keep ignoring that the fraternity's national committee suspended them as well.


They exercised free speech, they are still free and not in jail or being persecuted by the federal or state government, but they are being held responsible for their actions. Seems pretty much on the up and up to me

 

I'm not ignoring that the fraternity's national committee suspended them.  This isn't about that (though I disagree with it).

 

It's about PC and an institution forcing a certain view point.

 

This example is probably not a good one for me, especially with my limited knowledge of fraternity and university agreements.

 

Let me get this straight though so I have a clear understanding.  Say for example that the house in question wasn't a fraternity house, but just a house that a group of college students rented and are staying in.  It's off campus.  You are saying that the college/university has a say regarding what happens at the house?

---