Quote:There's no such than as a ' Palestinian people' in the context of an Arab people that have an historic homeland on Israeli land.   The purpose of having an entity called a 'Palestinian ' people is to destroy Israel.  If there was a ' Palestinian' people in the land of Israel,  there would be historic rulers and currency associated with these people.  These individuals are nomad Arabs.  They have no legit claim to the land of Israel.   Newt Gingrich told the truth about these fake beasts:

 

You just lost all credibility--all right to participate in basic human debate--when you painted all Arabs from the historic region of Palestine, a region which has been under Arab control for most of its existence, with the incredibly racist "fake beasts" brush. You actually might be the first and only person on my ignore list for that. Still deciding.

 

*Edit: My reasoning for labeling you as an overt racist is not that you're against the concept of a Palestinian state, because many people are, and they are for a variety of non-racially-motivated reasons. My problem, and the reason I'm calling you out as racist slime, is that you happily refer to millions of people, including children, as "beasts". Know who else thought that millions of people were the equivalent of animals or beasts? Nathaniel B. Forrest. George Wallace. Adolf Hitler. Osama bin Laden.

 

Go do yourself a favor and read up on the history of the region of Palestine. It may not have always been called "Palestine" in a governmental sense, but it was always a homeland for millions of people, most of whom happened to be Arabic. "False beasts." If you can really say that with a straight face, then the only false beast in the this thread is you pretending to be some kind of scholar on Middle Eastern affairs.

---