Some of you are on Brady's balls way hard.

 

But that is OK.

 

Here's the thing... if you don't like the power you gave the man when you offered it up for more money in the CBA......why give it to him?

why complain when he uses it? So much that you have now overthrown his power in "conduct" cases just about every time.

Why write it in, in the first place? Why give him the power in the first place?

 And why do they NOW all of a sudden feel it needs to be taken back. (golden boy rule)

 

It's simple. The union (I'm pretty anti-union btw) made concessions it wasn't really willing to concede. 

Now they are reneging on their part of the agreement. (violation of contract anyone?)

 

Goodell has never been a favorite of anyone's. Hell, I surely don't like the guy either. I'm not "On Goodell's side" 

I'm on the side of law. Which in a contract, is pretty cut and dry.

 

I give this, you give that, i make this rule, you allow this... yadda yadda, sign here...

 

It's like God giving man free will and when he uses it however he wants, he goes to Hell.

Pretty stupid.

 

Just like it's pretty stupid the NFL destroyed the video tape evidence for the Cheatriots during Spygate.

It's pretty stupid a dude smokes pot and can't play but a dude cheats and can.

It's pretty stupid the contracts are guaranteed, until they are not.

And it's pretty stupid that every year the NFL has SOME STORY to keep everyone watching their network.

 

Why have a CBA? Why have a union?

 

Why let off a guy because "there is no precedent"

At some point... someone starts the precedent...

 

 

like the one that has been started in the NFL. You get in trouble (outside of substance abuse policies) appeal, lose the appeal? Take it to federal court.

The NFL is pretty much 0 fer....

Why have a conduct policy at all? Let's let the head hunters and cheaters ruin the NFL for everyone, while everyone still keeps watching.

 

 

Let me guess your retort.... the CBA doesn't actually give Goodell the power he has?

Or it wasn't written meaning for him to abuse it?

Or there wasn't enough evidence that the Saints players had a role in bountygate?

Not enough evidence that Brady was uncooperative in full with the investigation?

How much evidence do you need? 

Not enough evidence that AP and Rice are abusers of weaker people? And their suspensions were light(ened).... LOL

 

 

I'm not saying the NFL (Roger) didn't mess this up along with a lot of other things in his time.

What I'm saying is Brady is not innocent. 

And that the NFLPA is wrong. And everyone who is siding with them simply because they don't like (and haven't liked since he got here) Goodell.

Anyone who argues different is arguing for arguing sake. (Big surprise on here)

Devil's advocate....

I don't like the tyrannical approach either... but then again I wouldn't have contractually agreed to it.

---