Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Kentucky Clerk Is Jailed For Refusal to Issue Marriage Licenses As A Result Of Her Religious Beliefs


Quote:I think that the whole problem regarding this issue comes down to one thing.  The term "marriage".  Both those on the left and the right want to "claim ownership" of the term, and neither side will budge.

 

There are those on the right that see the term "marriage" and think about the traditional (and sometimes religious) meaning of the word as being a union
between a man and a woman.

 

There are those on the left that see the term "marriage" and think about a union
between two people, regardless of sex.

 

So the terms "marry", "marriage" and "married" is really what the fight is all about.  The right doesn't want to give up the terms based on traditional and/or religious belief.  The left doesn't want to give the terms up based on "equality".

 

Now keep in mind, the term "marriage" has both a religious or traditional meaning as well as a legal meaning.  If a couple gets married (regardless if it's traditional or not) it must be recognized legally.  Even if you get married in a church, you still have to sign a legal
document to make it "official" in our country.

 

As it relates to this particular topic, a simple solution would be to call the legal document a "Civil Union License" rather than a "Marriage License".  Both sides are free to call such unions whatever they want, and the clerk would not be violating her belief by issuing a legal document for a Civil Union
.
Why make a separate definition? The term marriage has been around a very very long time and there are many historical precedents where it did not carry a religious or traditional meaning. 

 

In addition why are we picking and choosing which traditional definition to use? Some Mormons think traditional marriage is multiple wives. The simplest solution is, IMO to stop trying to keep people from marrying and if you still want to have a "traditional or religious" marriage no one is stopping you. The problem is the term marriage is like saying Q-tip. It's a ubiquitous word used for any types of unions. Why should the word be changed because some people are uncomfortable with two men or two women marrying? No one owns the word. 

Reply


Messages In This Thread
Kentucky Clerk Is Jailed For Refusal to Issue Marriage Licenses As A Result Of Her Religious Beliefs - by boudreaumw - 09-10-2015, 05:13 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!