Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal

#26

Quote:24 days is the maximum time if Iran does not appeal the request. Iran can drag it out a lot longer. And 24 days is plenty of time to ship out evidence of bomb making
and replace it with a radiation source allowed under the pact.
Iran has no need to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes, their only purpose is to build a weapon.
 

 

Quote:Experts seem to disagree with you.  And why would they move EVERYTHING out in 24 days, leaving behind traces of radiation looking as if they're hiding something?  
 

1. EVERYTHING? You need to read my posts.


 

2. What experts are saying that the residual radiation allowed under the pact has to be different from that used in weapon making? That's total nonsense and I doubt any nuclear physicist would be so stupid as to make that claim, but find me a link if you can.


 

Weapons use a combo of U235 and U238 as fuel. Power plant fuel is also a combo of those, but with a lower ratio of U235 to U238. Any radiation released from the weapons grade material would be the same as that released from the enrichment process. The ratios might be different, but that can be easily balanced out by crates of additional U238 at the site where the weapons grade uranium is kept.





                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by Ringo - 09-16-2015, 10:57 AM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by D6 - 09-16-2015, 11:37 AM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by D6 - 09-16-2015, 12:15 PM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by D6 - 09-16-2015, 12:28 PM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by D6 - 09-16-2015, 12:33 PM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by D6 - 09-16-2015, 12:36 PM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by D6 - 09-16-2015, 12:37 PM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by D6 - 09-16-2015, 12:42 PM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by MalabarJag - 09-16-2015, 01:01 PM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by Ringo - 09-16-2015, 06:54 PM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by Ringo - 09-17-2015, 05:11 PM
The Rally Against the Iran Nuke Deal - by jj82284 - 09-17-2015, 05:27 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!