Quote:1.) Funny how you talk about the discussion of science and then present no evidence in the form of pull quotes from the debate to make your argument. 

 

2.) I think the two practicing surgeons on stage would disagree with you.  

 

3.) When asked about climate change all they said was "We aren't going to enact a policy that the experts themselves say will not solve or change the proposed problem but will significantly [BLEEP] our economy."   When asked about vaccines all they said was use common sense to spread doses over longer periods of time not to overwhelm an infants ability to metabolize them.  If that's what you call being SCIENCE DENIERS then unfortunately that says a lot more about your personal bias than it does about the political right!

1. )That's because anyone with your bias does not care and might celebrate it and those that don't have our bias are aware of it. 

 

2. ) I think that no one shut down the non existant link to autism proves my point. 

 

3. ) I call science deniers people that don't shut down nonsense about vaccines and "links" to autism and call them out as the scaremongering it is. People that are on stage that think the world is 6,000 old(or is it 10,000 now?) as science deniers. I know the only science a lot of people on the right cares about is the kind that makes the most money or the kind that kills the most evil doers but other people care about more than that. Seriously just run Jenny McCarthy she'll fit right in. 

---