Quote:I haven't argued with you about SEC being better then the ACC. That still has no impact on how good FSU is. Their schedule is what their schedule is. You have some odd way about defining good teams. Vanderbilt is good simply because they lost to good teams and beat average to bad teams. FSU is bad because they crushed all of the opponents they have faced, even the really good to good teams.


Clemson already beat one of the best teams in the SEC. Georgia. Georgia pre-injury was a top 10 team. Now they aren't, but that isn't the team Clemson played.


Was florida "solid" pre-injury? Sure. But that isn't what we are talking about. Florida is a bad team right NOW. Why is this so hard for you to grasp?


I would tell you that you have an argument if FSU was struggling against the opponents they have faced. But they haven't. They have been dominate throughout the entire year. And they are very good at all phases of the game. There aren't many teams like that. Very few in fact. I do think they are as good as they have looked and hopefully they will get the chance to prove that in January.

i didnt say FSU was bad. we can't continue this discussion if you can't read what im saying


Georgia is the 6th best team in the SEC. ha. Clemson is good, but probably not even as good as SC.... the 5th best team in the SEC. your conference sucks and its just unfair to teams with real opponents each week if FSU gets to go to the title.


how hard is it to blow out your quality opponents when you can basically plan ahead by 3-4 weeks cause you don't play anybody?


i said Vanderbilt was solid, which they are.

---