Dude, in posts 753, 754, 760, and 763 you broke down how average Teddy was. In 760 you said "I don't think Bridgewater and Clowney are close in talent or close NFL prospects." Those are where you jumped into the debate. 

 

In 764 (after all 4 of those posts by you) I made the comment that I many times have seen Teddy ranked as the #2 prospect of this decade behind only Luck...which is true. You then decided to change the entire crux of your argument from "I don't think Bridgewater and Clowney are close in talent or close NFL prospects" to Teddy not being #2 of this decade...which is a clear changing of the goalposts by you.

 

The second part is me saying 'you have a vastly different opinion of Teddy than virtually anyone on the planet who is paid to evaluate QBs'. I proved that 100% of the 74 draft sites (updated in the last 2 months) on Walter's database have Teddy as a prospect on the level of Clowney. That would indeed show that your opinion ("I don't think Bridgewater and Clowney are close in talent or close NFL prospects") is not shared by anyone else on the planet who is paid to evaluate QBs.

---