Quote:Do you just make [BAD WORD REMOVED] up as you go along or what?

We were top 5 in sacks, but since our offense couldn't move the ball our defense were always gassed and usually were behind big by half.

No where did I imply we had a great defense. I've said many times our D over-achieved last year and injuries brought it crashing back to Earth.


No where did I say "it does not matter if JT had Manning"

what I said was "JT is a playmaker, regardless of where he's been"

Ignore it if you want. But you know you're just complaining to complain.


Anyone who says JT is just a Manning product is a dunce.

Lol Talk about making [BLEEP] up. Anyone who thinks its not atleast possible for JT to be a product of one of the best QBs of all time is an idiot. Are people dunces because they can be realistic?


How is " JT is a playmaker regardless of where he's been" not pretty much saying that it doesn't matter if he had Peyton Manning? He was a playmaker when he was with Peyton Manning. So were every WR/ TE that's ever played with him.


JT has to prove he doesn't only have playmaking ability when he's with a QB that threw 94 TDs in his two stellar years. I think he will, but it doesn't mean it's impossible for him to be a product of Peyton Manning.

---