Quote:There is just so much new here, I really think we need another post like.  Oh wait, there are tons here in this very thread.

 

After reading the article, it seems like the writer was focusing on the bigger picture.  The "Plan" if you will.  Which was to make the offense better and then build the defense.  He referenced the draft, how we drafted and showed how the "Plan" was being worked.  It also showed how the "Plan" was having an impact on the offense and our passing game like we haven't seen since Mark Brunell, Jmmy Smith and Keenan McCardell (and doing so without a HOF LT or a potential HOF RB or that line).  He made examples of some bad luck, injury to the #1 pick which was a part of the "Plan" to build the defense and also acknowledged some of the short comings.  Now you may not agree with the "Plan" or the person who is running it or coaching it, but again, at least this writer outside of Jacksonville actually made a thoughtful article and those types of posts here are very hard to come by over the last few weeks.  You could actually read the article which also happens to be the topic of discussion and give an opinion, disagreement and/or counter to what he actually said.  Or continue on, being lazy, making lazy posts repeating the same thing you say in multiple threads.  

They can stick that plan where the sun don't shine.

 

By year 3 there should be signs of the plan working.   AT 1-5 and the same issues keep popping up shows the plan has derailed against very mediocre competition.  Usually if a plan is not showing signs of working by year 3 it's time to hit the reset button.  Just bury your head in the sand and hold out hope a miracle will happen and bradley will take us to the promised land.

 

Gus has got to go and the whole article is rubbish. 

---