Quote:lol. I asked for the name of an ambassador that was killed in the last 36 years and or an instance that the bush administration blamed social media. You tried valiantly and failed. The simple objective fact that neither instance has occurred should be self evident why this particular instance is receiving special attention.


As to playing politics, that is laughable. It was the democrats (Clinton and Obama) that dragged us into this mess. Lybia was their baby. The idea that al queda was decimated was key to the Presidents re-election and Clinton's legacy as secretary of State, this instance objectively demonstrates that they made decisions based purely on advancing their political narrative no matter how dangerous and tragically lethal the situation on the ground became. Then when the unthinkable (yet predictable) happened instead of taking responsibility for their actions they doubled down on their partisan bend and advanced a totally false narrative out of whole cloth to demonize an American who was half way around the world when this all happened because of a video that the terrorists never saw.


The idea that the secretary of state would stand over the bodies of the fallen and tell families that had made the ultimate sacrifice "Don't you worry we're going to get the guy who made that awful video" is sickening. Anyone who can't see that is far more biased than Kevin McCarthy.

Wow. Did you major in revisionist history in college? And I just love the parameters you set in your arguments. How many ambassadors were killed where a politician blamed social media? Social media has been a major part of people's lives for how many presidents terms? You sure showed me. Your post is forcing me to rethink everything I know about myself. I'm asking myself questions like.. why do you continue to debate a guy who doesn't read anything you type, who can only sometimes formulate a rational post, who accuses you of lying if he doesn't like where an argument is going and who can never accept that he is wrong, even when his argument on a subject is shredded to dust.

---